Fight Against H.R. 2998—Contact Your U.S. Senators For A “NO” Vote
House Democrats—Tax The “Wealthy” For Obamacare
The Obama Disarmament Tour
Gotta love it when even a Democratic blog catches a Democrat contradicting himself on the “climate change” (a/k/a cap-and-trade) bill:
I received two different emails from him in response:
In one email, [Virginia Congressman Glenn] Nye [(D)]said I will be pleased to know the bill passed, praising it as “a comprehensive approach that charts a new course toward a clean energy economy” and “will create jobs, help end our dangerous dependence on foreign oil, and combat global warming” (without ever mentioning that he voted against it).
In the other email, Nye said I will be pleased to know that he voted against it “because we do not need another tax on American families during this time of economic hardship.”
This guy must have studied at the John Kerry School Of Having It Both Ways–he was for it even though he was against it!
In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg lets slip one of the secrets about abortion that most lefties don’t want people to know (emphasis added):
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.
The obvious question is, Justice Ginsburg, which “populations” are the ones “that we don’t want to have too many of”?