Conservative Wanderer

“A troubled and afflicted mankind looks to us, pleading for us to keep our rendezvous with destiny; that we will uphold the principles of self-reliance, self-discipline, morality, and, above all, responsible liberty for every individual that we will become that shining city on a hill.” — Ronald Wilson Reagan

The Republican Convention Far Exceeded My Expectations

Think of the “To Do” list that the RNC and the Romney campaign had for the Convention. It was probably something like this.

• Continue to rebuild the Republican brand.
• Come out of the Convention excited about our ticket.
• Give Republicans a reason to open their wallets.
• Highlight the choice the voters face.

I’m biased, but not so biased that I can’t see the obvious fact that each of these goals was met.

The Republican Brand. Let’s set Ryan and Romney aside for a moment. The Republicans demonstrated that they has built of bench of diverse (hate the word, but it’s accurate here), young, vibrant Republican leaders: from Chris Christie to Mia Love (soon the be my member of Congress) to Nikki Haley to Susanna Martinez (I’d never seen her before and was pleasantly surprised: she’s the real deal) to Marco Rubio to Kelly Ayotte (could have done better, but she’s gonna be fine) and on and on and on. This isn’t your father’s Republican party in terms of the faces you see, but it does seem to be the principled party we’ve always wanted it to be. Anyone notice that I mentioned only two men: how’s that “war on women” thing working for the Dems? I didn’t mention everyone. Can anyone think of young Democrats who bring the polish and principles of the new Republican bench? Debbie Wasserman-Schultz? Never mind.

Excitement About the Ticket. Ann Romney came across as smart, committed, and tough, especially if you’re going to describe her husband as an automaton. She is a huge asset. Paul Ryan: what can I say other than that he gave the best political speech since some of the great ones by President Reagan. [If the VP debate were sold on a “pay-per-view” basis, I’d be the first to get out the old credit card]. Bright, good-looking, amazingly articulate with a gift for absolute clarity, Ryan can calmly state truth in one sentence and then become a smiling “attack dog” in the next (and he does it without looking like a bully). Finally, Mitt. I hoped for a solid “B.” What we got was a great speech (I give it an A-). He doesn’t have Ryan’s gift, and it doesn’t come out as smoothly, but I felt inspired that this is the man who can turn American around—and compared to his opponent, there is no choice.

Opening the Wallet. See above. If there was ever a reason for conservatives/Republicans to put some skin in the game, this is the year. It really does matter.

The Clear Choice. The day Romney presented Ryan as his running mate, it became clear that this would be a campaign based on two stark choices: kick the can and demonization versus adults who make hard choices to solve problems. Their speeches and the other speeches continued to underline that choice.

And it’s nice that Isaac, while it caused its share of damage, wasn’t a re-run of Katrina. And isn’t it nice that the Good Lord wasn’t listening to Ellen Barkin’s tweet asking Him to wash all those evil Republicans out to sea.

I came out of the convention feeling better than I ever thought I would. In Jim Geraghty’s Morning Jolt (his morning e-mail that you can sign up for at NRO), he links to a tweet by Tabitha Hale: “Suddenly this doesn’t feel like 2008 anymore.” Indeed.

Buy some tinfoil this week to build your anti-demonization hats (watch Signs for the proper design). There’ll be a lot of it in the air next week emanating from North Carolina. It’s all they have.

The Truth About Rule 12

The last couple of days, there has been a lot of sturm und drang online about the RNC’s recently adopted Rule 12, much of it of the highly dramatic and emotional type. I think it’s time we sat down, put emotions to the side, and took an analytical and logical look at it. So everyone put your pointy Vulcan ears on and follow along.

Continue reading

Thoughts on Mia Love and a Brief Introduction to Tabula Rasa

Conservative Wanderer (CW) has kindly given me a corner of his platform to talk politics. I’m grateful. Before telling you a bit about myself, I’d like first to talk about Mia Love, the black conservative Utahn who wowed the convention last night. I’m proud to say that I live in Utah’s new fourth district and will have the honor of voting for Mia. I’m also a volunteer. Over at Ricochet, where CW and I hold forth from time to time, CW posted today about the “civil” leftist internet trolls who hacked Mia’s website in order to insert thoughtful phrases like “housen****r” to refer to her. I guess this is what lefties think passes for civil discourse these days (Cher and Ellen Barkin have certainly covered themselves with glory for their high-toned references to Republicans). Let me just say that Mia is no one’s pawn. She is a mom (three daughters), a wife, committed to her church, mayor of a fast-growing city, and truly conservative. If that weren’t enough she’s beautiful, smart, and principled. She has a tough race against a long-time incumbent blue-dog, but I believe she’ll prevail. If you’ve got a few dollars sent them to her. She is a classy person and I’ll be proud to have her as my representative in Congress.

Continue reading

Time, Politics, and Deficits

The 2012 presidential contest is the most important election since 1980. Our choice this year is more distinct than the one between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter. In 1980 the economy was mired in stagflation, people were genuinely hurting, and our leader was clueless; even so, we were not facing, as today, national bankruptcy.

Continue reading

Welcome, Tabula Rasa!

It’s been a while since I had a helping hand with the blogging chores around here, so I am very glad to introduce my new contributor, who goes by the moniker Tabula Rasa.

I’ll let him introduce himself if he wants… but I won’t wait to publish his first piece… it’ll be going up immediately after this post.

Ideology, Family Size, And The Electoral College

On Sunday, my friend BrentB67 wrote a post on Ricochet (currently behind the member paywall, sorry) asking about the shift in demographics and the effect on the Electoral College.

I wrote a couple of comments there, exploring the idea, but since Ricochet has a 200-word limit on comments, I decided to write out a longer response here.

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: